“Natural Born Citizen”

Requirements for POTUSA
Subscribe

“Law of Nations” is the Basis for the Constitution

March 27, 2009 By: admin0 Category: foreign influence, the Obama Problem

For those of you who have been following the whole birth certificate issue, you will know that there is really a lot of emphasis by the plaintiffs in these 40 suits on the words “natural born citizen.” Now, many Americans are under the impression that a citizen is the same thing. However, if that were true, then there would have been no reason for the Founding Fathers to stipulate that in order to be President, one would have to be a “natural born citizen.”
Leo Donofrio, retired New Jersey lawyer, has been the one leading the research in this area of Constitutional law. In his latest post on Natural Born Citizen.wordpress, Mr. Donofrio discusses the importance of Emerich de Vattel’s book “Law of Nations”, which was published in 1758, and the founders were very familiar with it. Vattel states “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens…“As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights…I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”
So, as Obama states on his website, his father was a Kenyan, a British Overseas citizen, and, according to British Nationality Act of 1948, Obama would have inherited British citizenship. And, therefore, ineligible to be President.

Will GWB’s Executive Order Oust the Usurper?

January 27, 2009 By: admin0 Category: foreign influence, the Obama Problem

According to an Executive Order signed by outgoing President George W. Bush, January 19, 2009, Dr. Orly Taitz has served the US Attorney Fitzgerald and the FBI of Chicago with a subpoena since they are named in the Executive Order to implement it.

The Executive Order is one that calls for Reinvestigation of “Individuals who are in Positions of Public Trust.” Others named in the EO to implement this are the US Secretary of State and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management. It is their duty, by this order, to examine the character of persons in the government employment, hence, even the President, is subject to this examination. You can see the Proof of Service here.
This particular Executive Order cannot be rescinded by #44, because it is the  basis of an ongoing law suit. Several lawmakers from Arizona have introduced legislation calling for future presidential candidates to supply proof of eligibility. However, of course, this will not solve the problem of removing the “Usurper”. But, possibly, this Executive Order will.

, , , ,

Obamagate

January 26, 2009 By: admin0 Category: grassroots, the Obama Problem

orly2.png

Well, there are still suits ongoing challenging # 44’s eligibility, as well as other news, in the effort to remove the “Usurper” from office. Of course, the whole Inauguration Flubby Dubby started out at the most inopportune moment astrologically, predicting that it would all be undone.

No sooner than he flubbed the Oath, The Globe Magazine hit the stands with its sensational front page, claiming Obama’s dirty secrets, “What Obama’s Hiding From America.”.

Philip Berg has not given up and issued a “quo warranto” suit.
Leo Donofrio revealed new information about the Fifth Amendment that unveils how it was corrupted in 1946 and that actually Americans do have Grand Jury Powers and can exercise those powers to take back the “peoples’ power.”

The Day after the Inauguration, the case that had been filed by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. questioning the eligibility of Barry Soetoro/Barack Onama to act as President of the United States, somehow disappeared from the Supreme Court docket on Januarry 21, 2009 when it was scheduled for a conference with SCOTUS.

Dr. Taitz is a dentist and an attorney who is representing Dr. Alan Keyes and others in a California case, that was moved to the U.S. Supreme Court. Dr. Taitz felt that this case might have “standing” because one of the plaintiffs is Dr. Alan Keyes, who was a Presidential candidate in 2008.

She is asking for the FBI and the US Attorney’s office to investigate this illegal tampering with the government computers.
So, the situation is not fully over yet, and what we have witnessed so far is just the beginning of the Patriots’ Movement.

, , , , , ,

Electoral College & Congress Confirm Obama Victory

January 08, 2009 By: admin0 Category: Electoral college, Campaign Issues, Racial issues, the Obama Problem

Today, January 8, 2009, the 111th Congress confirmed the Electoral College votes for Obama, so the political process has now been completed. It is only at this point that the US Supreme Court can intervene in what some are calling a “constitutional crisis.” Well it’s true, the constitution is an imperfect document. It was written an signed by men who were sexist and racists, actually most of them slaveholders.

However, the Article II outlining the necessary qualifications of the President of the United States is not racist or sexist. It simply lists the qualifications, namely at least 35 years of age, and a “natural born citizen”. The latter was thought to have been necessary in order to protect the Office of the Presidency from usurpers and conflicts of allegiances. As you may know, Governors, Senators and other government officials are not required to pass this rigorous requirement, and we have at least two sitting governors who are not “natural Born citizens:” namely Governor Arnold Schwarznegger of California, who is a “naturalized citizen and was born in Austria to two Austrian parents; and Governor Bobby Jindal, whose parents were Indian graduate students who recently immigrated to the U.S. Of course, Governor Jindal was born here. Nonetheless, his parents were not citizens at the time of his birth. There are a few more examples.

Now, the Constitution has been amended to include African Americans and Native Indians ascitizens. The Amendment process is fairly long and complicated process.

Now, according to scholars, like Larry Tribe and Ted Olsen, the Founding Fathers would not have wanted to penalize military families and their offspring in the service of their country.

Now, with the impending inauguration of Obama who was born a British subject, we seem to be running into un-chartered waters. Not only does he have a British citizenship, but, because he was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather, he also has Indonesian citizenship.

Now, according to Reverend James David Manning, a pastor in Harlem, the Constitutional requirements are being bent because of a racist affirmative action agenda. Reverend Manning seems to feel that it is actually contrary to the best interests of the Afro-American community for this to happen, because they will get the impression that “bending the law” is acceptable and that the standard has to be lowered for them to succeed. Obviously, there are a number of qualified Afro-American who are natural born citizens, like Michael Steele, Alan Keyes and Condolezza Rice who fulfill that “natural born citizen”requirement.
Yesterday, the past living presidents met for lunch and, I’m sure they know very well about all these questions, but they said nothing. the same thing with the Supreme Court, which has been put on notice by numerous private individuals. There is a case scheduled for conference with the Supreme Court before the inauguration: namely Berg’s and Stephen Pidgeon’s case that will be heard in the State of Washington Supreme Court.

, , , ,

20th Amendment & The Office of the Presidnecy

December 24, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Electoral college, Campaign Issues, the Obama Problem, McCain Alternative

houseofrep.jpg

In the beginning of the presidential primary, Fred Hollander sued John S. McCain because he said he was ineligible due to his place of birth in the Panama Canal.

Matthew McGill, Amir C. Tayrani and Charles G. Douglas III wrote the “Motion to Dismiss” the suit and you will notice that there are many points they make that are pertinent to the present question of Mr. Obama’s alleged constitutional ineligibity to serve in the Office of the Presidency.

Many of the supporters of Mr. Obama, claim that there is much ado about nothing, when it comes to pointing out Obama’s British citizenship. They point out that the Supreme Court has not held a hearing on the several cases that have been brought to the Supreme Court, so, therefore, there must not be any grounds for worry.

However, today, I read a little about the 20th amendment in the Motion to dismiss by Matthew McGill & Charles G. Douglass III (pg 11) that the Supreme Court’s may be reluctant to interfere with the candidate’s eligibility. According to the Constitution, that is part of the political process and rests with the respective parties and then, the Electoral College.

The Twentieth Amendment, however, does provide that the new Congress will have the responsibility to choose an “eligible” President, if the Electoral College fails to do so. It has been rumored that since Mr. Obama was born a British subject (by his own words), that some members of Congress will challenge the vote on January 6th of 2009.

McGill & Douglas go on to say that “if the court acted upon the question of the candidate’s eligibility before the Electoral College and Congress have acted, then “it may be involving itself in political matters and interfering with the Constitutional authority of the Electoral college and Congress to evaluate the qualifications of the candidate.” It might, furthermore, lead to aggrandizement of power in the judicial branch and the Framers were very careful to create a balance of powers.

These lawyers state that “the Supreme court and the lower federal courts have consistently held that voters do not have “standing to challenge the qualifications of candidates for elected federal office.”

McGill & Douglas also state that the courts do not rule on the eligibility to run for the Office of the Presidency, because that would impinge on their First Amendment rights, as well.

I might also mention that the Senate passed a Resolution (511) based on the scholarly opinions of Larry Tribe and Theodore Olsen that Senator McCain should be considered a “natural born citizen.”

, , , , ,

Another Look at Senate Resolution 511

December 23, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Electoral college, Campaign Issues, foreign influence, the Obama Problem

stephenpidgeon.jpg

A lot has been written about Senate Resolution 511, which was passed in April 2008 and said that John Sidney McCain III was “eligible” to run for President of the United States. Now only an Act of Congress ratified by 32 states can change the Constitution and children born to American citizens abroad are not regarded as “natural born citizens”, since the 1790 Nationality Act was repealed in 1795. Of course McCain was born in the Panama Canal while his parents were stationed there in the Navy in 1936.

What happened is that the Founding Fathers were highly skeptical of any kind of foreign influence in the executive office of the Presidency. Now, what I didn’t know before, is that, when the Resolution was introduced, the architects of the Senate Resolution, MacAskill, Leahy & Obama, also introduced the opinion of the legal scholars, Larry H. Tribe and Theodore B. Olsen, of the firm GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP, according to Prowland.wordpress.comTribe and Olsen go on to say that it was never the intention of the first Chief Justice, John Jay, or George Washington, in excluding a person like John S. McCain, as “not a hypothetical “foreigner,” as his parents were on a military base defending our country. This would be, according to these scholars, the “original intent “of the Founding Fathers.”

As some of you may know, Leo Donofrio and Cort Wrotnowski both filed Writs of Certiorari with the US Supreme Court against McCain, Obama and Calero stating that these three candidates were ineligible and were put on the State ballots improperly by the Secretary of State.

Both of those cases are pending, but the request for a “Stay” of the Electoral College was denied on December 15th.

There is another case that is due in January on the 8th, in Washington State. Attorney Stephen Pidgeon has filed a case there, and in that particular state, and only in that state, does an “ordinary” citizen have “standing” to challenge a candidate’s eligibility. Other state cases have been dismissed due to the plaintiff not having “standing.” A famous case, Berg v. Obama asks who does have “standing,” if not the ordinary citizen? However, Washington is the only State with a law to back it up.

Recently, Mike McGrew, a writer for english.pravda.ru remarked that if a usurper president is inaugurated, then no international treaties made during that tenure are binding. So there are very serious questions now, as we are facing a serious Constitutional crisis, and, in fact, if a “usurper” does take the Office, then the Constitution becomes null and void. So, while we think this is only a domestic issue, the implications are international and the situation is being watched abroad.

,

Constitution: Living Document or Original Intent?

December 23, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Electoral college, Campaign Issues, the Obama Problem

Dr. Edward Vieira, PhD, is here speaking of the US Constitution and the correct way to make changes to it. As a document, the Constitution should only be changed to reflect the wishes of the populace, rather than just the whim of the sitting legislature. Therefore, in order to change the constitution, will require quite a bit of time. also, the original meaning of the Constitution is not so obscure and is in plain language.
Listen here:

, ,

Electoral College Makes History Today: Dec. 15th

December 15, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Electoral college, Campaign Issues, the Obama Problem

stephendouglas.jpg

All over the media, we are hearing about the historical election of Barack Obama, as supposedly the first Black American President. Apparently no one reads any more. That myth was long ago disproved by Dr. Leroy Vaughn, MD, MBA, who is the genealogist and author of “Five Black American Presidents”, including Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Coolidge and Harding.
But, possibly there is another history that is being made. and that is the election and possible inauguration of a person who is not constitutionally qualified to be President of the United States. You see, after a long and bloody war of Independence from King George II, the founding Fathers were very concerned that no one, except a “natural born citizen” serve the critical office of the Presidency. To fulfill that requirement, one must be born on American soil and have 2 American born or naturalized American parents before birth.
By Obama’s own admission, he was born to a British subject, and, according to the British nationality Act of 1948, he would be automatically a British citizen at birth.
Another historical first is that we’ve probably never had a person scheduled for the Presidency who has been so secretive. All of his files are sealed, including, medical, college and birth certificates. He has spent a half a million in court fees to prevent any files from seeing the light of day.
However, according to Oil For Immigration, in the past, the Electoral College has even changed its “committed” votes and voted for someone else. That was in 1860, when 4 New Jersey electors who were supposed to vote for Stephen Douglas, actually voted for Abraham Lincoln. They have that prerogative and duty.
Now, if they knowingly vote for Obama as an ineligible candidate they may be guilty of treason, because they are acting against the Constitution. Today, the United States Supreme court denied a second case that was asking for a “Stay of the Election.” However, that case, Wrotnowski, along with a similar case, Donofrio’s, are still pending. What that means is that the Supreme Court has not intervened before the crime has been committed. By granting the “Stay”, they may have been pre-judging the Electors votes.

All we can do now is to wait until the Congress opens the sealed votes on January 6, 2009. Merry Christmas.

, , , ,

Chester Arthur: Usurper British President of the US?

December 11, 2008 By: admin0 Category: foreign influence, the Obama Problem

474px-chester_alan_arthur.jpg

As many of you have been following the events of this week Dec 8, 2008, Leo C. Donofrio’s request for a “Stay of the Electoral college” was denied and otherwise still pending, but a carbon-copy case (which he co-authored with Cort Wroknowski) has been submitted by Justice Scalia for conference on December 12th. Supposedly, if the “stay of the electoral college” is not granted the SCOTUS could still intervene before congress tallies their votes on January 6th.

There is some speculation that the Justices will want to hear this case of “first impression” about a constitutional issue, namely, “the natural born citizen’ clause requirement for POTUSA.

Now, in the course of Leo’s ongoing research, he made a discovery which contradicts a premise that he had asserted in the case. and that is that we have had 200 years wherein all of our Presidents have been “natural born citizens” or were grandfathered in (the Founding Fathers.)
However, the case of Chester Arthur came up. He became President after the assassination of James Garfield. Now some at LaRouchePAC speculate that the assassination was master-minded by the British who wanted Garfield out of the way because of his strong American protectionism and anti-slavery stance. Remember, that the Confederacy was supported by the British.

In any case, Leo was intrigued by the similarity of the Obama and Arthur cases. In both instances, there was a great deal of concern about “a foreign birth” and birth certificates. Both Red herrings. He determined, however, that Chester Arthur was definitely born in the U.S., (Vermont) but was born British, as was Barack Obama, due to the citizenship of their fathers at the time of their birth.

Chester Arthur lied about his age and his father’s age, and no one seemed to figure out that his father wasn’t naturalized as an American until Chester was 14. So, therefore, he is not and never could be a “Natural born citizen.” As a lawyer, he probably understood what he was doing, and, in fact, burned all his papers the day before he died, but was obviously not able to destroy the National Archive where his father’s naturalization records were. sound familiar with all the sealed school, medical and birth records of Obama?

Now, it gets even more interesting, because he appointed one Supreme Court Justice Horace Gray, who wrote an opinion that is very often cited in “anchor baby” cases: United States v. Wong Kim Ark. In that decision, a 6-2 opinion, written by Gray, children born on American soil to foreigners are considered citizens. However, they are not “natural born citizens.”

Now, as I mentioned before, James Garfield was hated by the British because the British interests, i.e., Rothschild & JP Morgan banks were not able to control him. On the other hand, I’m sure that British intelligence had the facts on Chester Arthur, just as European intelligence has the facts on Obama.

Arthur’s biography speaks nicely of his accomplishments as President, but I did notice that he did reduce the tariffs and developed more of an appeasement strategy with Europe. Again, with the British, it’s all about money. Was Chester Arthur a British agent? Why would he burn all his papers? May be the subject of an interesting book.

However, I might add, that a fraud does not establish a precedent.

I might also add that there is another case that has “standing” brought by Stephen Pidgeon in the State of Washington. According to a recently established law in that state, citizens have “standing” to require a presidential candidate to establish eligibility. You can listen Ed Hale interviewing both Stephen Pidgeon and Leo Donofrio here:

, , ,

Common Law Definition of Natural Born Citizen

November 24, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Electoral college, Campaign Issues, foreign influence, the Obama Problem

225px-noah_haynes_swayne_photo_head_and_shoulders_seated.jpg

According to a famous ruling of the U.S. v. Rhodes, written by Chief Justice Noah Haynes Swayne in 1866:”All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well [**18] as of England. There are two exceptions, and only two, to the universality of its application. The children of ambassadors are in theory born in the allegiance of the powers the ambassadors represent, and slaves, in legal contemplation, are property, and not persons. 2 Kent, Comm. 1; Calvin’s Case, 7 Coke, 1; 1 Bl. Comm. 366; Lynch v. Clarke, 1 Sand. Ch. 583.”
Also please note:”British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act _shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.”

The U.S. v. Rhodes case formed the basis for the Civil Rights act of 1866, or the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, granting citizenship to persons born on American soil jus soli. Native Indians born on American soil were understood to have allegiance to their tribes, until the Indian Citizenship Act was passed in 1924.

Add some commentary on Article II by one of the the most pronounced attorneys and justices of the time, St. George Tucker is quoted for saying in University of Chicago Press:

“That provision in the constitution which requires that the president shall be a native-born citizen (unless he were a citizen of the United States when the constitution was adopted,) is a happy means of security against foreign influence, which, where-ever it is capable of being exerted, is to be dreaded more than the plague.

A later decision, Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884), the United States Supreme Court emphasized that being born in the territory of the United States is not sufficient for citizenship.

, , , ,

‘Tis The Season for Treason?

November 23, 2008 By: admin0 Category: socialism, Electoral college, Campaign Issues, Racial issues, the Obama Problem, McCain Alternative

200px-clarence_thomas_official.jpg

I am not an historian, however, it is becoming more apparent everyday that there is a full fledged plot to overthrow the Constitution as the Founding Fathers intended it to be implemented.
I wanted to just cite Article II, Section 5 that lists the qualifications for President of the United States: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”


Now, just for your information, the 1790 Naturalization Act which allowed that “natural born status to be given to a child born of 2 American citizens abroad, was repealed in a later 1795 Naturalization Act. The 56 Founding Fathers changed their minds.
According to the lawyer, Leo C. Donofrio from N.J., his suit for a stay of the election was sabotaged by a clerk in the Supreme Court, but has now been accepted by Justice Clarence Thomas and distributed to the other 8 Justices and will be held in conference on December 5, 2008. At that time the Justices will decide whether to hear this case.
By the way, Mr. Donofrio’s suit calls into question the eligibility of three candidates, namely John McCain (who was born in Panama), Barack Obama who admitted that he was born with dual citizenship of Britain and the U.S., and Roger Calero, who was born in Nicaragua.
Leo Donofrio has a website that you can check for updates, thenaturalborncitizen.blogspot.
His recommendation is for Americans to become aware of the precedent for his case, which is McCarthy v. Briscoe 429 U.S. 1317 (1976). This case set a precedent for SCOTUS to force a Secretary of State to add or subtract a name from the state ballot.

That is what Donofrio’s original Stay was meant to do, but law clerk, Danny Bickell delayed its’ docketing; in fact, never docketed it, but just dismissed it out of hand. Clearly treason, definitely misconduct worthy of termination. apparently Bickell is an Obama supporter. The point is that Mr. Donofrio’s case is non-partisan.
In fact, tonight I listened to Justice Thomas speaking and he mentioned that one of the tests for neutrality would be in applying precedents and decisions to cases, irrespective of one’s feelings. Possibly you might be interested in listening to this great thinker speak on C-span

Another Judge from N.J., Judge Jack Sabatino, has also had a hand in attempting to sabotage the case, by making it seem as if Mr. Donofrio did not exhaust all the lower court remedies. However, Mr. Donofrio has kept his notes and receipts and can prove that he exhausted all lower court possibilities before approaching the Supreme Court for relief.
Here is his interview on Plains Radio in 8 parts:

Leo says that he, like other Americans were deceived by the Senate Resolution 511 which was “strangely” co-sponsored by Senator Obama and Senator MacAskill to make it okay for John McCain to run for POTUSA. The only thing is that the Senate, can not change the constitution.

That has to be done by an Act of Congress. I think we can all see that someone was trying to bamboozle the American people. Was it that constitutional lawyer or that war hero? The media was even bamboozled into thinking that he was “playing fair.” with John McCain. The only thing is that the original wording was “naturalized citizen”, so I believe that Obambi knew exactly what he was trying to do.

Reference for SCOTUS docket 08A407

, , , , , ,

Alan Keyes Sues California from Giving Electoral Votes to Obama

November 15, 2008 By: admin0 Category: the Obama Problem

alan_keyes3.jpg

Alan Keyes,as you ma know has had an extensive career in politics. He has been with the Republican Party, but most recently ran as an independent presidential candidate for the American Independent Party. He is a strong opponent of Barack Obama’s extreme views on abortion and once said “Jesus would not vote for Obama.”
As many of you know there are a multitude of suits across the U.S. demanding that the Electoral College not certify Obama because he has failed to submit his original birth certificate. Gary J Greep has filed the lawsuit in California Superior court in Sacramento.
I believe that since he is a candidate for the Presidency, Ambassador Keyes does have “standing”, which is one of te main reasons that the other cases have been dismissed.

New Obama Fraud?

November 13, 2008 By: admin0 Category: the Obama Problem

debbieschlussel.gif

Debbie Schlussel, an attorney and journalist has uncovered a so-called selective service registration for Barack Obama that appears to be a fraud. If you go to the link and read the article, the federal agent very carefully analyzes how the Selective Service document appears to have some major inaccuracies. Click on the link to see the document. supposedly, he registered in 1980, but the retired federal agent who requested the document under the FOIC, noticed quite a few discrepancies.

, ,

3 Attempts to Derail the Electoral College Vote

November 11, 2008 By: admin0 Category: grassroots, Campaign Issues, the Obama Problem

At this point, there seems to be disagreement between two of the principle attorneys who have filed lawsuits in Pennsylvania and in Hawaii. another lawsuit by a retired lawyer in New Jersey by Donofrio is slightly less known but has some weight. Andy Martin claims he has just a journalistic concern for the biographical details of Obama, but also claims that Frank Marshall Davis is Obama’s biological father. Philip J. Berg is actually a Democrat and feels that iti s his duty to protect the US constitution from a Manchurian candidate.

Andy Martin, J.D. and a journalist feels that Philip J. Berg’s lawsuit in Pennsylvania is not following the proper procedures. so far, Berg’s lawsuit has been dismissed from a federal court by Judge Barclay Surrick because of lack of “standing.” That means that the Judge said that attorney Berg is/was not qualified to question a candidate’s eligibility. To a non-legal mind, like mine, it seems that there has to be someone who will monitor these questions about a candidate’s eligibility and require them to submit proper documentation.

Even though the election results are in showing a victory for Barack Obama, the way that our democracy is set up, requires “checks and balances.” So, the next step is that the Electoral College will vote their choice on December 15th. On January 6th, Congress will then ratify the results. so, there are now some citizens who are appealing to the electoral college to “vet” the president-elect and require that he submit his documentation.

There is another, less well-known lawsuit by Leo Donofrio, according to prlog
which is called Donofrio v Wells. This retired lawyer is challenging the secretary of State in New Jersey, “demanding the Secretary execute her statutory and Constitutional duties to police the security of ballots in New Jersey from fraudulent candidates ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States due to their not being “natural born citizens” as enumerated in Article 1, Section 2, of the US Constitution. ”
This is a totally different approach. So which one, if any will prevail?

, , , , , , ,

Grassroots Movement to Take Back America

November 09, 2008 By: admin0 Category: grassroots, the Obama Problem

Very important is the formation of internet radio programs for the future of America. Lan Lamphere has a very interesting Patriot Brigade Radio and please send this link to your friends and post it on you website.
With the incoming administration, Obama may impose the ominous “Fairness Doctrine” to stifle opposition to his administration. There is another one called Talk Stream Live for other programs that may be silenced. He has already shown during the campaign that he does not tolerate opposition and with the appointment of Rahm Emmanuel, it also shows that he has no intention to be bipartisan.

, ,

Saul Alinsky Takes the White House

November 07, 2008 By: admin0 Category: socialism, the Obama Problem

As I mentioned in a previous post, Saul Alinsky was the inspiration for the Cloward-Piven Manufactured Crisis Strategy to force a regime change in a democracy. It was conceptualized by two professors at Columbia University where Barack Obama finished his undergraduate work. See Quin Hillyer’s article on how it will be difficult for conservatives to fight the radical left on Spectator.org

Obama Ordered to Respond to “A Certeriori Writ” by Justice Souter

November 05, 2008 By: admin0 Category: the Obama Problem

According to the the March Report Supreme Court Associate Justice David Hackett Souter (who usually votes with the liberal wing of the court) has ordered that the defendants in Philip J. Berg v. Barack Obama, et al. “are required to respond to Berg’s Writ of Certiorari” by Dec. 1. In simple English, that means Barack Obama may (or may not, depending on how Souter rules after receiving Obama’s response and Berg’s response to that) be required by the Supreme Court to provide valid documents that prove he is a “natural born” citizen of the United States and thus legally eligible to serve as President as required by Article II of the Constitution.

The meeting of the Electoral College is scheduled for December 15th.

, , ,

Hawaiian Dept of Health Confirms “Vault Birth Certificate” for Obama Never Accessed

November 01, 2008 By: admin0 Category: the Obama Problem

drchiyomefukinopatientgovingle.JPG

Andy Martin has now revealed that Director of Hawaiian Health Department, Dr. Chiyome Fukino has confirmed that there does exist a “vault birth certificate” for Barack Hussein Obama that has never been accessed.
This would mean that any of the so-called “original” birth certificates that the Obama campaign has posted on its site or given to factcheck, CNN or Bill O’Reilly, are, ipso facto, frauds. This is a claim that has been made by several forensic experts who have examined the online documents and found that they have major discrepancies and have, in fact, been photo-shopped from another birth certificate.
As of this morning, 11/01/08, no further information exists about the details on that “vault” document, except that it is being secured by the Hawaiian officials.
Other researchers have speculated that his vault copy would have been sealed in the archives after he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, as is the usual practice.
we will be awaiting further information and you may want to subscribe to Contrarian commentary.blogspot.com for further updates from Andy Martin.
The photo is of Dr. Fukino, a patient, and Governor Lingle.
Listen to what Obama said when he was disputing Judge Roberts’ confirmation to the Supreme Court, according to His Own Senate Webpage
“Let me also say that I remain distressed that the White House during this confirmation process, which overall went smoothly, failed to provide critical documents as part of the record that could have provided us with a better basis to make our judgment with respect to the nomination. This White House continues to stymie efforts on the part of the Senate to do its job. I hope with the next nominee who comes up for the Supreme Court that the White House recognizes that in fact it is its duty not just to the Senate but to the American people to make sure we can thoroughly and adequately evaluate the record of every single nominee who comes before us.”
Guess he should just follow his own advice, unless he has something to hide.

, , ,

Obama Campaign Strategy is to Dispirit the Republicans by Skewering the Polls

October 31, 2008 By: admin0 Category: the Obama Problem, Women

A former Obama supporter has left the campaign because of her perception of sexism again within that campaign and has admitted that her own internal polling reveals “no chance in the following states: Missouri, Indiana, North Carolina, Florida, New Hampshire and Nevada. Ohio leans heavily to McCain, but is too close to call it for him. Virginia, Pennsylvania, Colorado, New Mexico and Iowa are the true “toss up states”.
She further says that the Obama campaign’s sole strategy from the very beginning and the only way he wins is over a dispirited, disorganized, and demobilized opposition.

As far as last nights infomercial is concerned, according to israpundit says “Candidates who are well on their way to a landslide do not make “major speeches” in which they introduce new policy. Candidates who recognize that there is a deep mistrust of their policies do. Again, despite the best efforts of the leftist media, Obama’s deeply held Marxist beliefs have made it into the minds of mainstream America and Obama, without any lead in the polls, feels he must explain away the evidence

,

Honolulu “Discovery” Tour: Andy Martin & Obama’s Real Father

October 28, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Racial issues, foreign influence, the Obama Problem

sarahobama.jpg

On 9/17/2008, I wrote Who is Obama’s Real biological Father?. The Senator has created a complete obfuscation of his past. Instead, he has written two “memoirs” that purport to tell his life story. However, there are many contradictions and inconsistencies in his story.
Additionally, his radical associations have also come to the fore: Reverand Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, Nation of Islam, benefactor Dr. Khalil Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour, William Ayers, Bernadette Dohrn, Acorn and Rashish Khalil.
Chicago journalist and lawyer Andy Martin decided to go to Honolulu last week on a fact-finding mission to reveal Obama’s “secrets”. He also filed a suit with the Hawaiian supreme court to obtain Obama’s birth certificate.
When he returned, he was interviewed by CNN, who dismissed Martin’s claim that Frank Marshall Davis is Obama’s real biological father.
Martin did not offer any proof. Although I believe Andy, I feel that Andy may be using this as a ruse to irritate Obama to reveal the truth once and for all.
On the other hand, Jerome Corsi went to Kenya and will be publicizing a tape of Obama’s paternal grandmother in which she purportedly claims that she was present for Obama’s birth in Mombasa Kenya. Dr. Corsi will have an affidavit translation of her testimony.
The truth may be that Davis is his biological father and that Stanley did go to Kenya to have the baby.

, , , ,

Judge Surrick Scandal over Berg Dismissal

October 26, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Campaign Issues, foreign influence, the Obama Problem

2philip-berg.jpeg

At first, anyone who was following the Berg case was disappointed to find that Judge Surrick dismissed the Berg case saying that Philip J. Berg, a former Deputy District Attorney, had “no standing.” He even called the case “frivolous.
But upon further examination by legal experts, the decision, which was faxed to Philip Berg from his Chambers appears to have been, indeed, sent to Surrick himself for his signature.
In other words, he did not himself write the decision. Further discussion can be read Obama’s Public Relations Blunder. At this moment Berg’s site obamacrimes.com has received over 70 million hits. So people are wondering what Obama has to hide.
This is because there is the usual fax time on the top of the document, but at the very end of the 36 page decision, there is another earlier fax-time stamp. You can see the original at americasright.com.
Judge Barclay Surrick is a Clinton appointee.
It has been speculated that a former clerk for Judge Surrick, Christopher B. Seamans, who now works at Obama’s old law firm, Sidney-Austin, wrote the decision and faxed it to Judge Surrick for his signature. What he did not know was that there would be a time stamp on the decision that he faxed to Judge Surrick.

Haste makes waste.

, , ,

Socialism and the Dream of “Joe the Plumber”

October 17, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Racial issues, foreign influence, the Obama Problem

joeplumbercloseup.jpg

I read Penny Press’ hypnosis article, as the author points out that Obama is using well proven NLP and Eriksonian hypnosis techniques to control the masses, but let me comment. In order to be hypnotized, you must be a willing subject. Young people have always had a tendency to fall under the spell of something new.
Now, as far as older people who are voting for Obama, they must not be very intelligent, or possibly falling for the reverse race-baiting. These morons think that he’s just a “cool dude” like some average Afro-american.
However, Barry is not an Afro American. He is Arab-American and his primary training was done in a Muslim country. In fact, the first person I asked to give me his opinion of Obama was an Afro-american “god-nephew” of mine and he said well look at his ties with Zbigniew Brzezinski.
Actually, Barry is “not one of us”, not because of race, but because of his formative years in Indonesia.
Actually, he is a foreigner.
Look at the way he couldn’t even relate to the American dream of “Joe the Plumber.”
For Obama there is the working class and the governing class. That’s it.
In an Obama presidency, the phenomenon of H.Wayne Huziega’s rise from a garbage man to a billionaire would be impossible. And Obama would mock the aspirations of anyone who might think to follow in Huziega’s footsteps.
At this point, i think the API story is a hoax and that Judge Surrick is never going to deliver a decision in the Berg case.
But Obama is tripping himself up, today when he was mocking Joe the Plumber, America’s Everyman and Everywoman. His thugs went through Joe’s life and accused him of being a McCain plant. apparently, Obama forgot that he approached Joe. However, Joe asked a challenging question and Joe was quite respectful. However, the Messiah does not like to be questioned by his “inferiors.”
This is starting to show Obama’s real nature and his true psychiatric condition, which is Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
Winston Churchill said “Never try to murder your opponent when he is committing suicide.”

, , , , ,

African Press International Editor: Sammy Korir

October 15, 2008 By: admin0 Category: foreign influence, the Obama Problem

korir.jpg

With 20 days left to the 2008 Presidential election, an amazing posting hit the internet Michelle Obama telephone call to the API disclosing some shocking information about her husband.
Over the course of the following 24 hrs, Phillip J. Berg and others called Norway to confirm the story and request the audiotape. They were told it would be forthcoming.
In the meantime, many are in disbelief, feeling that it might just be a “planted rumor.”
In the meantime, someone pointed out a little information about the editor, Sammy Korir,a kenyan who now lives in Norway in asylum.
Why? Sharia law is now the law in Kenya because of Reile Odingo. Christians have fled Kenya because of the brutality in that country.
So, that may be the motivation for Sammy Korir to release the audio tape of Michelle Obama. Senator Obama raised about a million dollars to support the Odingo thug, according to Dr. Jerome Corsi
UpdateIt turns out that his story was ahoax perrpetrated by some guy in San Bruno California. samy@dumondetrading.net

, , ,

Michelle Admits Obama is An Indonesian

October 15, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Campaign Issues, foreign influence, the Obama Problem

philip-berg.jpeg

In a shocking development, only 20 days before the Presidential Election, African Press International reported that Michelle Obama called them to complain that the press corps there was not protecting her husband enough. Additionally, according toAPI, she also stated that “white racists” and envious blacks in the US were opposing her husband and went on to say “it is strange that API has chosen to support the racists against my husband. There is no shame in being adopted by a step father. All dirt has been thrown onto my husband’s face and yet he loves this country. My husband and I know that there is no law that will stop him from becoming the president, just because some American white racists are bringing up the issue of my husband’s adoption by His step father. The important thing here is where my husband’s heart is at the moment. I can tell the American people that My husband loves this country and his adoption never changed his love for this country. He was born in Hawaii, yes, and that gives him all the right to be an American citizen even though he was adopted by a foreigner; says Michelle Obama on telefon to API.”
For those of you who have been following the story, Indonesia does not recognize dual citizenship. Therefore, Obama would have lost his citizenship when he was adopted. This is most likely the reason he has refused to present his birth certificate in the federal lawsuit brought by Philip J. Berg in Philadelphia.
What’s more, he may actually be an illegal alien, and face deportation.

Now we know why the memoir’s title for the Indonesian translation of Barack Obama’s book is “Menerjang Harapan: Dari Jakarta Menuju Gedung Putih” which translates into “Assault Hope (Jihad): From Jakarta to the White House”.

, , ,

Obama & Manufactured Crisis Strategy

October 10, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Campaign Issues, foreign influence, the Obama Problem

A picture is worth a thousand words.
acorn-networ.jpg
According to James Simpson of American Thinker in the 1960’s, two extreme radicals from Columbia, Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, were inspired by Saul Alinsky to write what they named the Cloward-Piven Orchestrated Strategy of Crisis that would cause the overthrow of capitalism. They desired to cause chaos using “community organizers” to force the re-distribution of wealth.
Their strategy was to utilize crises such as the one occurring now to overburden the system.
The Democrats had actually been in charge of Congress for over 60 years up to 1994, and have created agendas which have been really socialistic in nature. The last one, of course, being the Community Re-investment Act which is responsible for the current crisis. At a news conference during the Clinton administration, Housing Secretary Cuomo actually admitted that the “forced sub-prime’ mortgages that would be backed by the government would fail, but was a remedy for the “fair housing suit.“.
Barack Obama was trained at the Saul Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation, so it is probable that during his Columbia years he became aware of this radical strategy.

, , , , , ,

Obama’s Executive Experience: A Disaster

October 07, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Campaign Issues, Racial issues, the Obama Problem

1ayers006.jpg

Last week, the Annenberg files were finally released and the true extent of Barack Obama’s relationship with unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers was seen in full measure. That is, somehow the funds that were obtained by bill Ayers, 50 million dollars, was dispensed by Barack Obama in his position as chairman of that foundation. It was supposed to be used to ameliorate the Chicago school system. However, instead of funding improved reading and mathematics, Barack Obama used the funding to teach radicalism to school children. In fact, according to the Ny Post, he channeled the annenburg money to his friend Madeline Talbott at Acorn.
When an assessment was made of the improvement, or lack thereof, these findings were made public.
A dismal failure.
And, now we, the American Public find out what he was hiding.
There is more, of course, but we will be accused of racism if we say anything else.
Stanley Kurtz has been the one who has been leading the research into the Annenberg papers, and had been thwarted by the university of Illinois for some time.

, , , , , ,

Obama Cites Technicalities on Berg Lawsuit: Fails to show Birth Certificate

September 25, 2008 By: admin0 Category: foreign influence, the Obama Problem

philip-berg.jpeg

Of course, a person is always assumed to be innocent until proven guilty, but in the simple Berg lawsuit obamacrimes.com, Philip J. Berg has asked for documents to prove his eligibility to be POTUSA. He sent his lawyers, instead to dismiss the complaint citing various legal issues, e.g. failure of Phillip J. Berg to show an “injury.”
Jeffrey Schreiber, a lawyer has been following the case and spoke with Mr. Berg following Obama’s response. The comments are included on this blog, AmericasRight, along with Mr. Berg’s plan of action, namely:
he is dropping the FEC as one of the defendants and adding the Secretary of State of Pennsylvania, Pedro Cortes, as one of the defendants, since he has a role to oversee the electoral process. Phillip Berg said: “Don’t get me wrong, I believe we have established standing with the complaint we filed, but also we’re going to add a few clauses which will clarify our standing to sue.”
His plan is to file an amended complaint on Monday 9/29/08.
Mr. Berg said he has been contacted by other citizens who are planning to file similar suits.
Mr. Berg went on to say:” The easy way to do this was to simply accept my challenge and turn over the vault copy of his birth certificate and oath of allegiance, but it is obvious by his waiting and by his hiding behind technicalities that those don’t exist.
Update 9/29: Amended complaint filed in federal Court.Awaiting Judge Surrick’s Decision.

, , , , ,

If Family is Fair Territory in Politics: Who is Obama’s real Father?

September 17, 2008 By: admin0 Category: foreign influence, the Obama Problem

frank_marshall_davis.jpg davisimage3.jpg baracksr.jpeg
barack-obama-ekp-002379.jpgkaleokualoha.jpeg

Recently, some astute observers, noting the close connection of Barack Obama Jr. to his mentor Frank Marshall Davis have suggested that possibly Frank, rather than Barack Hussein Obama Sr., is the biological father of the democratic presidential candidate.
In examining Frank’s literature, he does detail his and his wife’s sexual perversions, with teenage girls they shared. Explicitly in his writings.
It is well known that Grandpa Dunham took Barry to meet Davis.  Stanley Anne had met him in 1960. Why would Grandpa bring him to meet him? is the question. Frank Marshall Davis was a well known communist and pervert. Is it possible that they told Barry later who his real father was?
Also next to Barry’s picture is Frank’s son Mark Davis, (Kaleokualaha) born 1950.
If you examine the pictures above, I will leave it to you to make your decision about who looks more like Barack Obama Jr. It has been suggested that because Frank’s wife was a Chicago socialite and he had connections with socialists there, that was the reason for Obama’s returning there.

, , , ,

McCain’s Greatness Promoting Gender Equality

September 14, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Campaign Issues, women's support Groups, Women

Today I found out that after the primaries a prominent psychotherapist form Bethesda, Md. actually had contact with the Republican and Democratic inner circle about making sure that woman would play a more visible role in government. The reality is that she and a group of Hillary supporters met personally with Senator John McCain and an un-named member of Barack Obama’s finance Committee. The entire report by Dr. Lynette Long in the Baltimore Sun.
Senator McCain listened respectfully, while the Obama campaign absolutely refused to make a commitment to increasing female representation in the the white House, either as a VP pick or in Cabinet positions.
One wonders since both Barack Obama and John McCain have daughters why one would acquiesce, while the other would not.
As a psychotherapist, she obviously understands that little girls will be forever impacted by the decision that John McCain made.

, ,

Experience? Who Has It? Presidential Election 2008

September 13, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Campaign Issues, Misogynist Press, the Obama Problem, McCain Alternative

Does it matter? There is a steep learning curve for executive experience, and that is why many who have been successful governors go on to become successful presidents.
However, when Senator John McCain surprised the world with his announcement of Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate, the liberal establishment and their Hollywood “Pinhead Squad” were quick to denounce her. Not only did they belittle her accomplishments, but thought they could ease her accomplishments by calling her a mother. One South Carolina Democrat even went so far as to say that her own accomplishment was that she never had an abortion.
In her recent interview with Fox Commentator, Sean Hannity, she said that she doesn’t have “baby fat’, she has thick skin. Let’s examine the record:

, , , ,

Rampant Misogyny Towards Governor Palin in the Charlie Gibson Interview

September 12, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Misogynist Press, women's support Groups, Women

Never did I hear a newsman question Bobby Kennedy if he thought he could be the President since he had 11 kids. Apparently, that’s not a question newsman feel necessary to ask a male candidate for POTUSA.
Charlie Gibson anchor man from ABC, showed himself to be a paleolithic relic, when he asked Governor Sarah Palin those questions of whether she felt she could be the Vice President and mother at the same time.
My jaw dropped to the floor. But Governor Palin answered calmly.
Since these anchormen and women are actually “vetting” the candidate, it is tantamount to interviewing them for a job and could be considered by many as a gross violation of the laws that we have in place here in the United States preventing employers from asking those kinds of questions. I think they are applicable to the news media. Here’s the interview. Let me know what you think.

, , ,

Obama vs Palin: “Woman is the Nigga of the world”

September 11, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Campaign Issues, Racial issues, women's support Groups, McCain Alternative, Women

For all you John Lennon fans, you will recognize that, indeed, after marrying Yoko Ono, John did re-examine his chauvinistic ways and did, in fact, pen this famous song with her help.
Over the past 2 weeks, since John McCain announced Governor Palin’s V.P. nomination, the sexism has been rampant from all sorts of sources, some known and some laughable.
Most laughable is the fact that Obama is now campaigning against Sarah Palin, not John McCain. She has become the most talked-about woman in the world.
John Lennon speaks about his realizations, and performs, here on the Dick Cavatt show.

, , ,

Obama Calls Sarah a “Pig”

September 09, 2008 By: admin0 Category: Misogynist Press, the Obama Problem

You would think that after a grueling campaign with Hillary, and being chastised for his sexist treatment of her, Barry would have learned some respect for women. But apparently, he has lost all mental clarity.
While some have come to his defense, saying that he really didn’t “mean it”, I beg to differ. Obama was supposedly trained as a lawyer. Now the craft of the legal trade, or profession, is the skillful use of words. Let’s see what he did today to add to the list of Freudian slips that all testify to this man’s real state of mind. He is simply a huckster in an empty suit.